Cit vs ghanshyam huf

Author: uljp

August undefined, 2024

WebJul 16, 2009 · Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Ghanshyam (Huf) . S.H Kapadia, J.— Delay condoned. Leave granted. The controversy in the present batch of … WebOn the facts and circumstances of the case, and with due respect to the decision relied by the CIT(A), appellant would like to rely upon the decision of Hon. Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Ghanshyam 4 ITA No.168/PUN/2016, A.Y. 2011-12 (HUF) (2009) 315 ITR-1(SC), dt.16-07-2009, which is logically as well as with reference to the scheme of ...

Interest on enhanced compensation u/s 28 of Land Acquisition …

WebOct 29, 2024 · The reason as mentioned in the explanatory memorandum to FA – 2009 is different & not superseding the ratio drawn in CIT Vs Ghanshyam (HUF). Amendment by FA-2009 has just changed the method of taxability of interest on compensation from year wise accrual to year of receipt. In absence of any further specific … WebMar 12, 2024 · {CIT Vs Ghanshyam Das Mukim (1979) 118 ITR 930 (Punj & Har)} – An HUF is created if there exist a valid will. E. Creation of HUF by Partition of a larger Hindu … simple line drawing of an owl

Commr.Of I.T.Faridabad vs Ghanshyam (Huf) on 16 July, …

WebCIT Vs Ghanshyam (HUF) 5. Bharat Earth Movers Vs CIT (2000) 245 ITR 428 (SC) 1. Grace Collis and others Vs CIT (2001) 248 ITR 323 (SC) 2. CIT Vs Madras Auto Services Ltd. (1998) 233 ITR 468 SC 3. CIT Vs National … WebThe Ld.CIT(A) has considered all the judgments mentioned in the present grounds of Appeal and since the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Singh & Ors … WebJun 19, 2024 · During the arguments before us, the ld. AR argued that the issue before us stands covered by the orders of the higher Courts, Coordinate Benches mentioned … rawson freeport tx

Sh. Ganesh Dass Mehta, Sirsa v. Pr. CIT, Hisar - Casemine

The Bombay Chartered Accountants

WebJul 12, 2024 · In Rama Bai vs CIT, (1990) 181 ITR 400 (SC), dt. 8/11/1989, case of AY 1967-68-69, it is has held that – arrears of interest computed on delayed or enhanced … rawson gear boxWebJul 12, 2024 · “curious case of ghanshyam huf: Another question, which arises for anybody’s concern is Hon’ble Aprex Court in the case of CIT v. Ghanshyam (HUF), … rawson general store

"WebMay 14, 2024 · 12. In Bikram Singh vs. Land Acquisition Collector (1996) 89 taxmann 119 (SC) three judges bench decisions dated September 12, 1996 considered the provisions of Section 2 (28A) of the income tax act and defined the meaning of the interest.The issue before the court was whether interest received on amount of compensation Under the … " - Cit vs ghanshyam huf

Cit vs ghanshyam huf

WebJul 16, 2009 · The controversy in the present batch of civil appeals pertainsto the interpretation of Section 45(5)of the Income-tax Act, 1961,as it stood prior to 1.4.2004. … WebMay 17, 2024 · In our considered view, the findings of the Ld. CIT (A) are based on the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ganshyam HUF (supra) and the …

Did you know?

WebManjeet Singh HUF Vs CIT of CWP No 15506 of 2013 dated 14.01.2014, Naresh Kumar Jain and others Vs State of Haryana ... been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court … WebApr 10, 2024 · Ghanshyam (HUF) (2009) 182 Taxman 368, wherein it was held that interest under section 28 of the Act of 1894 is part of the amount of compensation whereas …

WebIn these circumstances the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Ghanshyam (HUF) (Supra) and CIT Rajkot Vs. Govindbhai Mamaiya are not applicable … WebMay 19, 2024 · AfterGhanshyam (HUF> [2009] 315 ITR 1 (SC), it was settled thatinterest received on compensation or enhanced compensation under section 28 of Land …

WebNov 8, 2024 · Placing rejoinder to the above, the ld. AR again drew our attention to the copy of the order of ITAT Delhi ‘F’ Bench in the case of Ram Kishan (supra) and submitted that in this order, the Tribunal has considered lead judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case CIT vs. Ghanshyam (HUF) (supra) as well as the judgement of the Hon ... WebHUF of his son, his wife & minor children . For avoiding the clutches of sec 64 (1)(vi) such gifts better be avoided {CIT Vs Smt. T. Suryamani Kothavalsala (2003) 263 ITR 271} {CIT Vs S.N. Malhotra (1989) 178 ITR 380 (Cal)}3 • HUF can accept gifts from relations who may not be the member of the family.

Webcit vs ghanshyam huf 315 itr 1 sc. H: Seeking grant of bail - the alleged manner and method of commission of... H: Cancellation of registration of petitioner - since the …

WebSep 27, 2024 · CIT vs. Chet Ram (HUF) S. 45 (5): Enhanced compensation and interest thereon under an interim order passed by the High Court in pending appeals relating to land acquisition matter are liable to be assessed for income tax … simple line drawing of a pine coneWebJul 10, 2024 · The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 5. The Ld. counsel for the assessee read the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs.Ghanshyam (HUF) (2009) 182 Taxman 368 (SC) and argued that the amount received by the assessee is under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and not u/s 34 of … rawson glenvistaWebOct 31, 2024 · Ghanshyam Dass (HUF) reported in 315 ITR 1 further affirmed in CIT vs. Govindbhai Mamaiya reported in 367 ITR 498 (SC) wherein it has been held that the … simple line drawing flowerWebAggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal to the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings before CIT(A) it was contended that the Supreme Court has in CIT vs. Ghanshyam Dass (HUF) [2009] 315 ITR 1 held interest on enhanced compensation to be a part of compensation and therefore the same is exempt u/s. 10(37) of the Act. rawson group logoWebJul 9, 2024 · Chet Ram (HUF) dated 12.9.2024 in Civil Appeal No.13053/2024 wherein also the Hon’ble Supreme Court has again reiterated the proposition laid down in the case of … rawson group contactWebIn CIT Ghanshyam (HUF) [2009] 8 SCC 412, Interest earned under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act,which is on enhanced compensation, ... Following its earlier decision in Ghanshyam (HUF), the Supreme Court held that the interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on the enhanced income was to be taxed in the year ... rawson groupWebApex Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ghanshyam(HUF), 315 ITR 1 (SC) in support of its above contention. The AO dismissed . ITA No.1591/Chd/2024 A.Y. 2010-11 4 the contention of the assessee stating that the issue of taxability of interest on enhanced compensation was now covered by the amended provisions of sections 56(2)(viii), ... rawson golf